quick_cache 0.5.2

Lightweight and high performance concurrent cache
Documentation

Quick Cache

Crates.io Docs CI

Lightweight and high performance concurrent cache optimized for low cache overhead.

  • Small overhead compared to a concurrent hash table
  • Scan resistent and high hit rate caching policy
  • User defined weight per item
  • Scales well with the number of threads
  • Atomic operations with get_or_insert and get_value_or_guard functions
  • Atomic async operations with get_or_insert_async and get_value_or_guard_async functions
  • Doesn't use background threads
  • Only trivially verifiable usages of unsafe
  • Small dependency tree

The implementation is optimized for use cases where the cache access times and overhead can add up to be a significant cost. Features like: time to live, iterators, event listeners and others; are not currently implemented in Quick Cache. If you need these features you may want to take a look at the Moka crate.

Examples

Basic usage

use quick_cache::unsync::Cache;

fn main() {
    let cache = Cache::new(5);
    cache.insert("square", "blue");
    cache.insert("circle", "black");
    assert_eq!(*cache.get(&"square").unwrap(), "blue");
    assert_eq!(*cache.get(&"circle").unwrap(), "black");
}

A cache with custom item weights. In this case according to the string length of the value.

use quick_cache::{Weighter, sync::Cache};

#[derive(Clone)]
struct StringWeighter;

impl Weighter<u64, String> for StringWeighter {
    fn weight(&self, _key: &u64, val: &String) -> u32 {
        // Be cautions out about zero weights!
        val.len().clamp(1, u32::MAX as usize) as u32
    }
}

fn main() {
    let cache = Cache::with_weighter(100, 100_000, StringWeighter);
    cache.insert(1, "1".to_string());
    cache.insert(54, "54".to_string());
    cache.insert(1000, "1000".to_string());
    assert_eq!(cache.get(&1000).unwrap(), "1000");
}

Using the Equivalent trait for complex keys

use quick_cache::{sync::Cache, Equivalent};

#[derive(Debug, Hash)]
pub struct Pair<A, B>(pub A, pub B);

impl<A, B, C, D> Equivalent<(C, D)> for Pair<A, B>
where
    A: PartialEq<C>,
    B: PartialEq<D>,
{
    fn equivalent(&self, rhs: &(C, D)) -> bool {
        self.0 == rhs.0 && self.1 == rhs.1
    }
}

fn main() {
    let cache: Cache<(String, i32), String> = Cache::new(5);
    cache.insert(("square".to_string(), 2022), "blue".to_string());
    cache.insert(("square".to_string(), 2023), "black".to_string());
    assert_eq!(cache.get(&Pair("square", 2022)).unwrap(), "blue");
}

Benchmarks

Since this crate is performance oriented it needs some comparisons. That said, benchmarks can be misleading so take everything with a pinch of salt.

Benchmarks performed with mokabench in a x64 Linux OS + Intel i9-12900H CPU.

Trace 1 (S3 from the Arc paper)

Cache Max Capacity Clients Hit Ratio(%) Elapsed time(s)
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 100000 1 2.327 2.479
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 100000 3 2.327 6.171
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 100000 6 2.328 12.467
QuickCache Sync Cache 100000 1 12.764 2.465
QuickCache Sync Cache 100000 3 12.765 1.387
QuickCache Sync Cache 100000 6 12.764 0.835
Mini Moka Sync Cache 100000 1 10.436 10.473
Mini Moka Sync Cache 100000 3 10.541 8.439
Mini Moka Sync Cache 100000 6 10.366 8.008
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 400000 1 12.039 2.956
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 400000 3 12.041 6.939
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 400000 6 12.043 13.503
QuickCache Sync Cache 400000 1 42.044 3.250
QuickCache Sync Cache 400000 3 42.044 1.299
QuickCache Sync Cache 400000 6 42.044 0.777
Mini Moka Sync Cache 400000 1 42.544 9.671
Mini Moka Sync Cache 400000 3 41.525 7.052
Mini Moka Sync Cache 400000 6 41.007 6.618
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 800000 1 56.600 3.221
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 800000 3 56.603 5.921
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 800000 6 56.605 12.768
QuickCache Sync Cache 800000 1 66.801 3.980
QuickCache Sync Cache 800000 3 66.802 1.418
QuickCache Sync Cache 800000 6 66.803 0.798
Mini Moka Sync Cache 800000 1 70.304 10.613
Mini Moka Sync Cache 800000 3 68.054 4.754
Mini Moka Sync Cache 800000 6 66.288 4.137

Trace 2 (DS1 from the Arc paper)

Cache Max Capacity Clients Hit Ratio(%) Elapsed time(s)
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 1000000 1 3.086 10.097
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 1000000 3 3.085 22.443
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 1000000 6 3.082 41.351
QuickCache Sync Cache 1000000 1 15.052 9.426
QuickCache Sync Cache 1000000 3 15.059 4.139
QuickCache Sync Cache 1000000 6 15.078 2.467
Mini Moka Sync Cache 1000000 1 14.910 28.974
Mini Moka Sync Cache 1000000 3 13.257 24.681
Mini Moka Sync Cache 1000000 6 13.518 22.759
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 4000000 1 20.245 9.863
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 4000000 3 20.250 19.418
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 4000000 6 20.259 36.932
QuickCache Sync Cache 4000000 1 44.565 9.083
QuickCache Sync Cache 4000000 3 44.574 4.272
QuickCache Sync Cache 4000000 6 44.569 2.449
Mini Moka Sync Cache 4000000 1 45.398 31.108
Mini Moka Sync Cache 4000000 3 44.236 21.381
Mini Moka Sync Cache 4000000 6 41.723 18.719
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 8000000 1 43.035 9.751
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 8000000 3 43.034 16.554
HashLink (LRU w/ Mutex) 8000000 6 43.031 34.978
QuickCache Sync Cache 8000000 1 71.124 7.675
QuickCache Sync Cache 8000000 3 71.139 3.198
QuickCache Sync Cache 8000000 6 71.143 2.348
Mini Moka Sync Cache 8000000 1 67.447 28.462
Mini Moka Sync Cache 8000000 3 67.995 17.054
Mini Moka Sync Cache 8000000 6 64.738 12.929

References

License

This project is licensed under the MIT license.