tame-oauth 0.10.0

A (very) simple oauth 2.0 library
Documentation 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62

[graph]
targets = [
    "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu",
    "x86_64-unknown-linux-musl",
    "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc",
    "x86_64-apple-darwin",
]
all-features = true

[advisories]
version = 2
ignore = []

[bans]
multiple-versions = "deny"
deny = ["openssl", "openssl-sys"]

[licenses]
version = 2
# We want really high confidence when inferring licenses from text
confidence-threshold = 0.92
allow = ["Apache-2.0", "MIT", "Unicode-DFS-2016"]
exceptions = [
    { allow = [
        "ISC",
    ], name = "untrusted" },
    { allow = [
        "ISC",
        "MIT",
        "OpenSSL",
    ], name = "ring" },
    { allow = [
        "Zlib",
    ], name = "tinyvec" },
]

[[licenses.clarify]]
name = "ring"
# SPDX considers OpenSSL to encompass both the OpenSSL and SSLeay licenses
# https://spdx.org/licenses/OpenSSL.html
# ISC - Both BoringSSL and ring use this for their new files
# MIT - "Files in third_party/ have their own licenses, as described therein. The MIT
# license, for third_party/fiat, which, unlike other third_party directories, is
# compiled into non-test libraries, is included below."
# OpenSSL - Obviously
expression = "ISC AND MIT AND OpenSSL"
license-files = [{ path = "LICENSE", hash = 0xbd0eed23 }]

[[licenses.clarify]]
name = "encoding_rs"
expression = "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause"
license-files = [{ path = "COPYRIGHT", hash = 0x39f8ad31 }]

[[licenses.clarify]]
name = "webpki"
expression = "ISC"
license-files = [{ path = "LICENSE", hash = 0x001c7e6c }]

[[licenses.clarify]]
name = "rustls-webpki"
expression = "ISC"
license-files = [{ path = "LICENSE", hash = 0x001c7e6c }]