hickory_proto/rr/dnssec/rdata/sig.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680
// Copyright 2015-2023 Benjamin Fry <benjaminfry@me.com>
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, <LICENSE-APACHE or
// https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license <LICENSE-MIT or
// https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your option. This file may not be
// copied, modified, or distributed except according to those terms.
//! signature record for signing queries, updates, and responses
use std::fmt;
#[cfg(feature = "serde")]
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
use crate::{
error::*,
rr::{
dnssec::Algorithm, Name, RData, RecordData, RecordDataDecodable, RecordType, SerialNumber,
},
serialize::binary::*,
};
use super::DNSSECRData;
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// NOTE: RFC 2535 was obsoleted with 4034+, with the exception of the
/// usage for UPDATE, which is what this implementation is for.
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1 SIG RDATA Format
///
/// The RDATA portion of a SIG RR is as shown below. The integrity of
/// the RDATA information is protected by the signature field.
///
/// 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3
/// 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
/// | type covered | algorithm | labels |
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
/// | original TTL |
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
/// | signature expiration |
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
/// | signature inception |
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
/// | key tag | |
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ signer's name +
/// | /
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-/
/// / /
/// / signature /
/// / /
/// +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
///
/// ```
/// [RFC 2931](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2931), DNS Request and Transaction Signatures, September 2000
///
/// NOTE: 2931 updates SIG0 to clarify certain particulars...
///
/// ```text
/// RFC 2931 DNS SIG(0) September 2000
///
/// 3. The SIG(0) Resource Record
///
/// The structure of and type number of SIG resource records (RRs) is
/// given in [RFC 2535] Section 4.1. However all of Section 4.1.8.1 and
/// the parts of Sections 4.2 and 4.3 related to SIG(0) should be
/// considered replaced by the material below. Any conflict between [RFC
/// 2535] and this document concerning SIG(0) RRs should be resolved in
/// favor of this document.
///
/// For all transaction SIG(0)s, the signer field MUST be a name of the
/// originating host and there MUST be a KEY RR at that name with the
/// public key corresponding to the private key used to calculate the
/// signature. (The host domain name used may be the inverse IP address
/// mapping name for an IP address of the host if the relevant KEY is
/// stored there.)
///
/// For all SIG(0) RRs, the owner name, class, TTL, and original TTL, are
/// meaningless. The TTL fields SHOULD be zero and the CLASS field
/// SHOULD be ANY. To conserve space, the owner name SHOULD be root (a
/// single zero octet). When SIG(0) authentication on a response is
/// desired, that SIG RR MUST be considered the highest priority of any
/// additional information for inclusion in the response. If the SIG(0)
/// RR cannot be added without causing the message to be truncated, the
/// server MUST alter the response so that a SIG(0) can be included.
/// This response consists of only the question and a SIG(0) record, and
/// has the TC bit set and RCODE 0 (NOERROR). The client should at this
/// point retry the request using TCP.
///
/// 3.1 Calculating Request and Transaction SIGs
///
/// A DNS request may be optionally signed by including one SIG(0)s at
/// the end of the query additional information section. Such a SIG is
/// identified by having a "type covered" field of zero. It signs the
/// preceding DNS request message including DNS header but not including
/// the UDP/IP header and before the request RR counts have been adjusted
/// for the inclusions of the request SIG(0).
///
/// It is calculated by using a "data" (see [RFC 2535], Section 4.1.8) of
/// (1) the SIG's RDATA section entirely omitting (not just zeroing) the
/// signature subfield itself, (2) the DNS query messages, including DNS
/// header, but not the UDP/IP header and before the reply RR counts have
/// been adjusted for the inclusion of the SIG(0). That is
///
/// data = RDATA | request - SIG(0)
///
/// where "|" is concatenation and RDATA is the RDATA of the SIG(0) being
/// calculated less the signature itself.
///
/// Similarly, a SIG(0) can be used to secure a response and the request
/// that produced it. Such transaction signatures are calculated by
/// using a "data" of (1) the SIG's RDATA section omitting the signature
/// itself, (2) the entire DNS query message that produced this response,
/// including the query's DNS header but not its UDP/IP header, and (3)
/// the entire DNS response message, including DNS header but not the
/// UDP/IP header and before the response RR counts have been adjusted
/// for the inclusion of the SIG(0).
///
/// That is
///
/// data = RDATA | full query | response - SIG(0)
///
/// where "|" is concatenation and RDATA is the RDATA of the SIG(0) being
/// calculated less the signature itself.
///
/// Verification of a response SIG(0) (which is signed by the server host
/// key, not the zone key) by the requesting resolver shows that the
/// query and response were not tampered with in transit, that the
/// response corresponds to the intended query, and that the response
/// comes from the queried server.
///
/// In the case of a DNS message via TCP, a SIG(0) on the first data
/// packet is calculated with "data" as above and for each subsequent
/// packet, it is calculated as follows:
///
/// data = RDATA | DNS payload - SIG(0) | previous packet
///
/// where "|" is concatenations, RDATA is as above, and previous packet
/// is the previous DNS payload including DNS header and the SIG(0) but
/// not the TCP/IP header. Support of SIG(0) for TCP is OPTIONAL. As an
/// alternative, TSIG may be used after, if necessary, setting up a key
/// with TKEY [RFC 2930].
///
/// Except where needed to authenticate an update, TKEY, or similar
/// privileged request, servers are not required to check a request
/// SIG(0).
///
/// Note: requests and responses can either have a single TSIG or one
/// SIG(0) but not both a TSIG and a SIG(0).
///
/// 3.2 Processing Responses and SIG(0) RRs
///
/// If a SIG RR is at the end of the additional information section of a
/// response and has a type covered of zero, it is a transaction
/// signature covering the response and the query that produced the
/// response. For TKEY responses, it MUST be checked and the message
/// rejected if the checks fail unless otherwise specified for the TKEY
/// mode in use. For all other responses, it MAY be checked and the
/// message rejected if the checks fail.
///
/// If a response's SIG(0) check succeed, such a transaction
/// authentication SIG does NOT directly authenticate the validity any
/// data-RRs in the message. However, it authenticates that they were
/// sent by the queried server and have not been diddled. (Only a proper
/// SIG(0) RR signed by the zone or a key tracing its authority to the
/// zone or to static resolver configuration can directly authenticate
///
/// data-RRs, depending on resolver policy.) If a resolver or server does
/// not implement transaction and/or request SIGs, it MUST ignore them
/// without error where they are optional and treat them as failing where
/// they are required.
///
/// 3.3 SIG(0) Lifetime and Expiration
///
/// The inception and expiration times in SIG(0)s are for the purpose of
/// resisting replay attacks. They should be set to form a time bracket
/// such that messages outside that bracket can be ignored. In IP
/// networks, this time bracket should not normally extend further than 5
/// minutes into the past and 5 minutes into the future.
/// ```
#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", derive(Deserialize, Serialize))]
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Clone)]
pub struct SIG {
type_covered: RecordType,
algorithm: Algorithm,
num_labels: u8,
original_ttl: u32,
sig_expiration: u32,
sig_inception: u32,
key_tag: u16,
signer_name: Name,
sig: Vec<u8>,
}
impl SIG {
/// Creates a new SIG record data, used for both RRSIG and SIG(0) records.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `type_covered` - The `RecordType` which this signature covers, should be NULL for SIG(0).
/// * `algorithm` - The `Algorithm` used to generate the `signature`.
/// * `num_labels` - The number of labels in the name, should be less 1 for *.name labels,
/// see `Name::num_labels()`.
/// * `original_ttl` - The TTL for the RRSet stored in the zone, should be 0 for SIG(0).
/// * `sig_expiration` - Timestamp at which this signature is no longer valid, very important to
/// keep this low, < +5 minutes to limit replay attacks.
/// * `sig_inception` - Timestamp when this signature was generated.
/// * `key_tag` - See the key_tag generation in `rr::dnssec::Signer::key_tag()`.
/// * `signer_name` - Domain name of the server which was used to generate the signature.
/// * `sig` - signature stored in this record.
///
/// # Return value
///
/// The new SIG record data.
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
pub fn new(
type_covered: RecordType,
algorithm: Algorithm,
num_labels: u8,
original_ttl: u32,
sig_expiration: u32,
sig_inception: u32,
key_tag: u16,
signer_name: Name,
sig: Vec<u8>,
) -> Self {
Self {
type_covered,
algorithm,
num_labels,
original_ttl,
sig_expiration,
sig_inception,
key_tag,
signer_name,
sig,
}
}
/// Add actual signature value to existing SIG record data.
///
/// # Arguments
///
/// * `signature` - signature to be stored in this record.
///
/// # Return value
///
/// The new SIG record data.
pub fn set_sig(self, signature: Vec<u8>) -> Self {
Self {
type_covered: self.type_covered,
algorithm: self.algorithm,
num_labels: self.num_labels,
original_ttl: self.original_ttl,
sig_expiration: self.sig_expiration,
sig_inception: self.sig_inception,
key_tag: self.key_tag,
signer_name: self.signer_name,
sig: signature,
}
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.1), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.1 Type Covered Field
///
/// The "type covered" is the type of the other RRs covered by this SIG.
/// ```
pub fn type_covered(&self) -> RecordType {
self.type_covered
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.2), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.2 Algorithm Number Field
///
/// This octet is as described in section 3.2.
/// ```
pub fn algorithm(&self) -> Algorithm {
self.algorithm
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.3), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.3 Labels Field
///
/// The "labels" octet is an unsigned count of how many labels there are
/// in the original SIG RR owner name not counting the null label for
/// root and not counting any initial "*" for a wildcard. If a secured
/// retrieval is the result of wild card substitution, it is necessary
/// for the resolver to use the original form of the name in verifying
/// the digital signature. This field makes it easy to determine the
/// original form.
///
/// If, on retrieval, the RR appears to have a longer name than indicated
/// by "labels", the resolver can tell it is the result of wildcard
/// substitution. If the RR owner name appears to be shorter than the
/// labels count, the SIG RR must be considered corrupt and ignored. The
/// maximum number of labels allowed in the current DNS is 127 but the
/// entire octet is reserved and would be required should DNS names ever
/// be expanded to 255 labels. The following table gives some examples.
/// The value of "labels" is at the top, the retrieved owner name on the
/// left, and the table entry is the name to use in signature
/// verification except that "bad" means the RR is corrupt.
///
/// labels= | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
/// --------+-----+------+--------+----------+----------+
/// .| . | bad | bad | bad | bad |
/// d.| *. | d. | bad | bad | bad |
/// c.d.| *. | *.d. | c.d. | bad | bad |
/// b.c.d.| *. | *.d. | *.c.d. | b.c.d. | bad |
/// a.b.c.d.| *. | *.d. | *.c.d. | *.b.c.d. | a.b.c.d. |
/// ```
pub fn num_labels(&self) -> u8 {
self.num_labels
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.4), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.4 Original TTL Field
///
/// The "original TTL" field is included in the RDATA portion to avoid
/// (1) authentication problems that caching servers would otherwise
/// cause by decrementing the real TTL field and (2) security problems
/// that unscrupulous servers could otherwise cause by manipulating the
/// real TTL field. This original TTL is protected by the signature
/// while the current TTL field is not.
///
/// NOTE: The "original TTL" must be restored into the covered RRs when
/// the signature is verified (see Section 8). This generally implies
/// that all RRs for a particular type, name, and class, that is, all the
/// RRs in any particular RRset, must have the same TTL to start with.
/// ```
pub fn original_ttl(&self) -> u32 {
self.original_ttl
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.5), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.5 Signature Expiration and Inception Fields
///
/// The SIG is valid from the "signature inception" time until the
/// "signature expiration" time. Both are unsigned numbers of seconds
/// since the start of 1 January 1970, GMT, ignoring leap seconds. (See
/// also Section 4.4.) Ring arithmetic is used as for DNS SOA serial
/// numbers [RFC 1982] which means that these times can never be more
/// than about 68 years in the past or the future. This means that these
/// times are ambiguous modulo ~136.09 years. However there is no
/// security flaw because keys are required to be changed to new random
/// keys by [RFC 2541] at least every five years. This means that the
/// probability that the same key is in use N*136.09 years later should
/// be the same as the probability that a random guess will work.
///
/// A SIG RR may have an expiration time numerically less than the
/// inception time if the expiration time is near the 32 bit wrap around
/// point and/or the signature is long lived.
///
/// (To prevent misordering of network requests to update a zone
/// dynamically, monotonically increasing "signature inception" times may
/// be necessary.)
///
/// A secure zone must be considered changed for SOA serial number
/// purposes not only when its data is updated but also when new SIG RRs
/// are inserted (ie, the zone or any part of it is re-signed).
/// ```
///
/// [RFC 2535](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2535#appendix-C), Appendix B: Changes from RFC 2065, 3.
///
/// ```text
/// (3b) clarifying that signature expiration and inception use
/// serial number ring arithmetic
/// ```
pub fn sig_expiration(&self) -> SerialNumber {
SerialNumber(self.sig_expiration)
}
/// see [`Self::sig_expiration`]
pub fn sig_inception(&self) -> SerialNumber {
SerialNumber(self.sig_inception)
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.6), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.6 Key Tag Field
///
/// The "key Tag" is a two octet quantity that is used to efficiently
/// select between multiple keys which may be applicable and thus check
/// that a public key about to be used for the computationally expensive
/// effort to check the signature is possibly valid. For algorithm 1
/// (MD5/RSA) as defined in [RFC 2537], it is the next to the bottom two
/// octets of the public key modulus needed to decode the signature
/// field. That is to say, the most significant 16 of the least
/// significant 24 bits of the modulus in network (big endian) order. For
/// all other algorithms, including private algorithms, it is calculated
/// as a simple checksum of the KEY RR as described in Appendix C.
/// ```
pub fn key_tag(&self) -> u16 {
self.key_tag
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.7), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.7 Signer's Name Field
///
/// The "signer's name" field is the domain name of the signer generating
/// the SIG RR. This is the owner name of the public KEY RR that can be
/// used to verify the signature. It is frequently the zone which
/// contained the RRset being authenticated. Which signers should be
/// authorized to sign what is a significant resolver policy question as
/// discussed in Section 6. The signer's name may be compressed with
/// standard DNS name compression when being transmitted over the
/// network.
/// ```
pub fn signer_name(&self) -> &Name {
&self.signer_name
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-4.1.8), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 4.1.8 Signature Field
///
/// The actual signature portion of the SIG RR binds the other RDATA
/// fields to the RRset of the "type covered" RRs with that owner name
/// and class. This covered RRset is thereby authenticated. To
/// accomplish this, a data sequence is constructed as follows:
///
/// data = RDATA | RR(s)...
///
/// where "|" is concatenation,
///
/// RDATA is the wire format of all the RDATA fields in the SIG RR itself
/// (including the canonical form of the signer's name) before but not
/// including the signature, and
///
/// RR(s) is the RRset of the RR(s) of the type covered with the same
/// owner name and class as the SIG RR in canonical form and order as
/// defined in Section 8.
///
/// How this data sequence is processed into the signature is algorithm
/// dependent. These algorithm dependent formats and procedures are
/// described in separate documents (Section 3.2).
///
/// SIGs SHOULD NOT be included in a zone for any "meta-type" such as
/// ANY, AXFR, etc. (but see section 5.6.2 with regard to IXFR).
/// ```
pub fn sig(&self) -> &[u8] {
&self.sig
}
}
impl BinEncodable for SIG {
/// [RFC 4034](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4034#section-6), DNSSEC Resource Records, March 2005
///
/// This is accurate for all currently known name records.
///
/// ```text
/// 6.2. Canonical RR Form
///
/// For the purposes of DNS security, the canonical form of an RR is the
/// wire format of the RR where:
///
/// ...
///
/// 3. if the type of the RR is NS, MD, MF, CNAME, SOA, MB, MG, MR, PTR,
/// HINFO, MINFO, MX, HINFO, RP, AFSDB, RT, SIG, PX, NXT, NAPTR, KX,
/// SRV, DNAME, A6, RRSIG, or (rfc6840 removes NSEC), all uppercase
/// US-ASCII letters in the DNS names contained within the RDATA are replaced
/// by the corresponding lowercase US-ASCII letters;
/// ```
fn emit(&self, encoder: &mut BinEncoder<'_>) -> ProtoResult<()> {
let is_canonical_names = encoder.is_canonical_names();
self.type_covered().emit(encoder)?;
self.algorithm().emit(encoder)?;
encoder.emit(self.num_labels())?;
encoder.emit_u32(self.original_ttl())?;
encoder.emit_u32(self.sig_expiration().0)?;
encoder.emit_u32(self.sig_inception().0)?;
encoder.emit_u16(self.key_tag())?;
self.signer_name()
.emit_with_lowercase(encoder, is_canonical_names)?;
encoder.emit_vec(self.sig())?;
Ok(())
}
}
impl<'r> RecordDataDecodable<'r> for SIG {
fn read_data(decoder: &mut BinDecoder<'r>, length: Restrict<u16>) -> ProtoResult<Self> {
let start_idx = decoder.index();
// TODO should we verify here? or elsewhere...
let type_covered = RecordType::read(decoder)?;
let algorithm = Algorithm::read(decoder)?;
let num_labels = decoder.read_u8()?.unverified(/*technically valid as any u8*/);
let original_ttl = decoder.read_u32()?.unverified(/*valid as any u32*/);
let sig_expiration = decoder.read_u32()?.unverified(/*valid as any u32, in practice should be in the future*/);
let sig_inception = decoder.read_u32()?.unverified(/*valid as any u32, in practice should be before expiration*/);
let key_tag = decoder.read_u16()?.unverified(/*valid as any u16*/);
let signer_name = Name::read(decoder)?;
// read the signature, this will vary buy key size
let sig_len = length
.map(|u| u as usize)
.checked_sub(decoder.index() - start_idx)
.map_err(|_| ProtoError::from("invalid rdata length in SIG"))?
.unverified(/*used only as length safely*/);
let sig = decoder
.read_vec(sig_len)?
.unverified(/*will fail in usage if invalid*/);
Ok(Self::new(
type_covered,
algorithm,
num_labels,
original_ttl,
sig_expiration,
sig_inception,
key_tag,
signer_name,
sig,
))
}
}
impl RecordData for SIG {
fn try_from_rdata(data: RData) -> Result<Self, RData> {
match data {
RData::DNSSEC(DNSSECRData::SIG(csync)) => Ok(csync),
_ => Err(data),
}
}
fn try_borrow(data: &RData) -> Option<&Self> {
match data {
RData::DNSSEC(DNSSECRData::SIG(csync)) => Some(csync),
_ => None,
}
}
fn record_type(&self) -> RecordType {
RecordType::SIG
}
fn into_rdata(self) -> RData {
RData::DNSSEC(DNSSECRData::SIG(self))
}
}
/// specifically for outputting the RData for an RRSIG, with signer_name in canonical form
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
pub fn emit_pre_sig(
encoder: &mut BinEncoder<'_>,
type_covered: RecordType,
algorithm: Algorithm,
num_labels: u8,
original_ttl: u32,
sig_expiration: SerialNumber,
sig_inception: SerialNumber,
key_tag: u16,
signer_name: &Name,
) -> ProtoResult<()> {
type_covered.emit(encoder)?;
algorithm.emit(encoder)?;
encoder.emit(num_labels)?;
encoder.emit_u32(original_ttl)?;
encoder.emit_u32(sig_expiration.0)?;
encoder.emit_u32(sig_inception.0)?;
encoder.emit_u16(key_tag)?;
signer_name.emit_as_canonical(encoder, true)?;
Ok(())
}
/// [RFC 2535](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2535#section-7.2), Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
///
/// ```text
/// 7.2 Presentation of SIG RRs
///
/// A data SIG RR may be represented as a single logical line in a zone
/// data file [RFC 1033] but there are some special considerations as
/// described below. (It does not make sense to include a transaction or
/// request authenticating SIG RR in a file as they are a transient
/// authentication that covers data including an ephemeral transaction
/// number and so must be calculated in real time.)
///
/// There is no particular problem with the signer, covered type, and
/// times. The time fields appears in the form YYYYMMDDHHMMSS where YYYY
/// is the year, the first MM is the month number (01-12), DD is the day
/// of the month (01-31), HH is the hour in 24 hours notation (00-23),
/// the second MM is the minute (00-59), and SS is the second (00-59).
///
/// The original TTL field appears as an unsigned integer.
///
/// If the original TTL, which applies to the type signed, is the same as
/// the TTL of the SIG RR itself, it may be omitted. The date field
/// which follows it is larger than the maximum possible TTL so there is
/// no ambiguity.
///
/// The "labels" field appears as an unsigned integer.
///
/// The key tag appears as an unsigned number.
///
/// However, the signature itself can be very long. It is the last data
/// field and is represented in base 64 (see Appendix A) and may be
/// divided up into any number of white space separated substrings, down
/// to single base 64 digits, which are concatenated to obtain the full
/// signature. These substrings can be split between lines using the
/// standard parenthesis.
///
/// foo.nil. SIG NXT 1 2 ( ;type-cov=NXT, alg=1, labels=2
/// 19970102030405 ;signature expiration
/// 19961211100908 ;signature inception
/// 2143 ;key identifier
/// foo.nil. ;signer
/// AIYADP8d3zYNyQwW2EM4wXVFdslEJcUx/fxkfBeH1El4ixPFhpfHFElxbvKoWmvjDTCm
/// fiYy2X+8XpFjwICHc398kzWsTMKlxovpz2FnCTM= ;signature (640 bits)
/// ```
impl fmt::Display for SIG {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> Result<(), fmt::Error> {
write!(f, "{ty_covered} {alg} {num_labels} {original_ttl} {expire} {inception} {tag} {signer} {sig}",
ty_covered = self.type_covered,
alg = self.algorithm,
num_labels = self.num_labels,
original_ttl = self.original_ttl,
expire = self.sig_expiration,
inception = self.sig_inception,
tag = self.key_tag,
signer = self.signer_name,
sig = data_encoding::BASE64.encode(&self.sig)
)
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
#![allow(clippy::dbg_macro, clippy::print_stdout)]
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test() {
use std::str::FromStr;
let rdata = SIG::new(
RecordType::NULL,
Algorithm::RSASHA256,
0,
0,
2,
1,
5,
Name::from_str("www.example.com").unwrap(),
vec![
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29, 31,
], // 32 bytes for SHA256
);
let mut bytes = Vec::new();
let mut encoder: BinEncoder<'_> = BinEncoder::new(&mut bytes);
assert!(rdata.emit(&mut encoder).is_ok());
let bytes = encoder.into_bytes();
println!("bytes: {bytes:?}");
let mut decoder: BinDecoder<'_> = BinDecoder::new(bytes);
let restrict = Restrict::new(bytes.len() as u16);
let read_rdata = SIG::read_data(&mut decoder, restrict).expect("Decoding error");
assert_eq!(rdata, read_rdata);
}
}