[−][src]Crate minicbor_derive
Procedural macros to derive minicbor's Encode
and Decode
traits.
Deriving is supported for struct
s and enum
s. The encoding is optimised
for forward and backward compatibility and the overall approach is
influenced by Google's Protocol Buffers.
The goal is that ideally a change to a type still allows older software, which is unaware of the changes, to decode values of the changed type (forward compatibility) and newer software, to decode values of types encoded by older software, which do not include the changes made to the type (backward compatibility).
In order to reach this goal, the encoding has the following characteristics:
-
The encoding does not contain any names, i.e. no field names, type names or variant names. Instead, every field and every constructor needs to be annotated with an (unsigned) index number, e.g.
#[n(1)]
. -
Unknown fields are ignored during decoding.
-
Optional types default to
None
if their value is not present during decoding. -
Optional enums default to
None
if an unknown variant is encountered during decoding.
Item 1 ensures that names can be changed freely without compatibility concerns. Item 2 ensures that new fields do not affect older software. Item 3 ensures that newer software can stop producing optional values. Item 4 ensures that enums can get new variants that older software is not aware of. By "fields" we mean the elements of structs and tuple structs as well as enum structs and enum tuples. In addition, it is a compatible change to turn a unit variant into a struct or tuple variant if all fields are optional.
From the above it should be obvious that non-optional fields need to be present forever, so they should only be part of a type after careful consideration.
It should be emphasised that an enum
itself can not be changed in a
compatible way. An unknown variant causes an error. It is only when they
are declared as an optional field type that unknown variants of an enum
are mapped to None
. In other words, only structs can be used as
top-level types in a forward and backward compatible way, enums can not.
Example
use minicbor::{Encode, Decode}; #[derive(Encode, Decode)] struct Point { #[n(0)] x: f64, #[n(1)] y: f64 } #[derive(Encode, Decode)] struct ConvexHull { #[n(0)] left: Point, #[n(1)] right: Point, #[n(2)] points: Vec<Point>, #[n(3)] state: Option<State> } #[derive(Encode, Decode)] enum State { #[n(0)] Start, #[n(1)] Search { #[n(0)] info: u64 } }
In this example the following changes would be compatible in both directions:
-
Renaming every identifier.
-
Adding optional fields to
Point
,ConvexHull
,State::Start
orState::Search
. -
Adding more variants to
State
iffState
is only decoded as part ofConvexHull
. Direct decoding ofState
would produce anUnknownVariant
error for those new variants.
Attributes and borrowing
Each field and variant needs to be annotated with an index number, which is
used instead of the name, using either n
or b
as attribute names.
For the encoding it makes no difference which one to choose. For decoding,
b
indicates that the value borrows from the decoding input, whereas n
produces non-borrowed values (except for implicit borrows).
Encoding format
The actual CBOR encoding to use can be selected by attaching either the
#[cbor(array)]
or #[cbor(map)]
attribute to structs, enums or
enum variants. By default #[cbor(array)]
is implied. The attribute
attached to an enum applies to all its variants but can be overriden per
variant with another such attribute.
Implicit borrowing
The following types implicitly borrow from the decoding input, which means their lifetimes are constrained by the input lifetime:
&'_ str
&'_ [u8]
Option<&'_ str>
Option<&'_ [u8]>
Explicit borrowing
If a type is annotated with #[b(...)]
, all its lifetimes will be
constrained to the input lifetime.
If the type is a std::borrow::Cow<'_, str>
or std::borrow::Cow<'_, [u8]>
type, the generated code will decode the inner type and construct a
Cow::Borrowed
variant, contrary to the Cow
impl of Decode
which
produces owned values.
Other attributes
encode_with
, decode_with
and with
Fields in structs and enum variants may be annotated with
#[cbor(encode_with = "path")]
, #[cbor(decode_with = "path")]
or
#[cbor(with = "module-path")]
where path
is the full path to a
function which is used instead of Encode::encode
to encode the field or
Decode::decode
to decode the field respectively. The types of these
functions must be equivalent to Encode::encode
or Decode::decode
.
The with
attribute combines the other two with module-path
denoting the
full path to a module with two functions encode
and decode
as members,
which are used for encoding and decoding of the field. These three
attributes can either override an existing Encode
or Decode
impl or be
used for types which do not implement those traits at all.
transparent
A #[cbor(transparent)]
attribute can be attached to structs with
exactly one field (aka newtypes). If present, the generated Encode
and
Decode
impls will just forward the encode
/decode
calls to the inner
type, i.e. the resulting CBOR representation will be identical to the one
of the inner type.
CBOR encoding
The CBOR values produced by a derived Encode
implementation are of the
following formats.
Structs
Array encoding
By default or if a struct has the #[cbor(array)]
attribute, it will
be represented as a CBOR array. Its index numbers are represened by the
position of the field value in this array. Any gaps between index numbers
are filled with CBOR NULL values and Option
s which are None
likewise
end up as NULLs in this array.
<<struct-as-array encoding>> =
`array(n)`
item_0
item_1
...
item_n
Map encoding
If a struct has the #[cbor(map)]
attribute, then it will be
represented as a CBOR map with keys corresponding to the numeric index
value:
<<struct-as-map encoding>> =
`map(n)`
`0` item_0
`1` item_1
...
n item_n
Optional fields whose value is None
are not encoded.
Enums
Each enum variant is encoded as a two-element array. The first element is the variant index and the second the actual variant value:
<<enum encoding>> =
| `array(2)` n <<struct-as-array encoding>> ; if #[cbor(array)]
| `array(2)` n <<struct-as-map encoding>> ; if #[cbor(map)]
Which encoding to use?
The map encoding needs to represent the indexes explicitly in the encoding
which costs at least one extra byte per field value, whereas the array
encoding does not need to encode the indexes. On the other hand, absent
values, i.e. None
s and gaps between indexes are not encoded with maps but
need to be encoded explicitly with arrays as NULLs which need one byte each.
Which encoding to choose depends therefore on the nature of the type that
should be encoded:
-
Dense types are types which contain only few
Option
s or theirOption
s are assumed to beSome
s usually. They are best encoded as arrays. -
Sparse types are types with many
Option
s and theirOption
s are usuallyNone
s. They are best encoded as maps.
When selecting the encoding, future changes to the type should be considered as they may turn a dense type into a sparse one over time.
Derive Macros
Decode | Derive the |
Encode | Derive the |