solana_zk_sdk/zk_elgamal_proof_program/instruction.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385
//! Instructions provided by the [`ZK ElGamal proof`] program.
//!
//! There are two types of instructions in the proof program: proof verification instructions and
//! the `CloseContextState` instruction.
//!
//! Each proof verification instruction verifies a certain type of zero-knowledge proof. These
//! instructions are processed by the program in two steps:
//! 1. The program verifies the zero-knowledge proof.
//! 2. The program optionally stores the context component of the zero-knowledge proof to a
//! dedicated [`context-state`] account.
//!
//! In step 1, the zero-knowledge proof can either be included directly as the instruction data or
//! pre-written to an account. The progrma determines whether the proof is provided as instruction
//! data or pre-written to an account by inspecting the length of the data. If the instruction data
//! is exactly 5 bytes (instruction discriminator + unsigned 32-bit integer), then the program
//! assumes that the first account provided with the instruction contains the zero-knowledge proof
//! and verifies the account data at the offset specified in the instruction data. Otherwise, the
//! program assumes that the zero-knowledge proof is provided as part of the instruction data.
//!
//! In step 2, the program determines whether to create a context-state account by inspecting the
//! number of accounts provided with the instruction. If two additional accounts are provided with
//! the instruction after verifying the zero-knowledge proof, then the program writes the context
//! data to the specified context-state account.
//!
//! NOTE: A context-state account must be pre-allocated to the exact size of the context data that
//! is expected for a proof type before it is included as part of a proof verification instruction.
//!
//! The `CloseContextState` instruction closes a context state account. A transaction containing
//! this instruction must be signed by the context account's owner. This instruction can be used by
//! the account owner to reclaim lamports for storage.
//!
//! [`ZK ElGamal proof`]: https://docs.solanalabs.com/runtime/zk-token-proof
//! [`context-state`]: https://docs.solanalabs.com/runtime/zk-token-proof#context-data
use {
crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::proof_data::ZkProofData,
bytemuck::{bytes_of, Pod},
num_derive::{FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive},
num_traits::{FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive},
solana_program::{
instruction::{AccountMeta, Instruction},
pubkey::Pubkey,
},
};
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[repr(u8)]
pub enum ProofInstruction {
/// Close a zero-knowledge proof context state.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
/// 0. `[writable]` The proof context account to close
/// 1. `[writable]` The destination account for lamports
/// 2. `[signer]` The context account's owner
///
/// Data expected by this instruction:
/// None
///
CloseContextState,
/// Verify a zero-ciphertext proof.
///
/// A zero-ciphertext proof certifies that an ElGamal ciphertext encrypts the value zero.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `ZeroCiphertextProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyZeroCiphertext,
/// Verify a ciphertext-ciphertext equality proof.
///
/// A ciphertext-ciphertext equality proof certifies that two ElGamal ciphertexts encrypt the
/// same message.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `CiphertextCiphertextEqualityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyCiphertextCiphertextEquality,
/// Verify a ciphertext-commitment equality proof.
///
/// A ciphertext-commitment equality proof certifies that an ElGamal ciphertext and a Pedersen
/// commitment encrypt/encode the same message.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `CiphertextCommitmentEqualityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyCiphertextCommitmentEquality,
/// Verify a public key validity zero-knowledge proof.
///
/// A public key validity proof certifies that an ElGamal public key is well-formed and the
/// prover knows the corresponding secret key.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `PubkeyValidityData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyPubkeyValidity,
/// Verify a percentage-with-cap proof.
///
/// A percentage-with-cap proof certifies that a tuple of Pedersen commitments satisfy a
/// percentage relation.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `PercentageWithCapProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyPercentageWithCap,
/// Verify a 64-bit batched range proof.
///
/// A batched range proof is defined with respect to a sequence of Pedersen commitments `[C_1,
/// ..., C_N]` and bit-lengths `[n_1, ..., n_N]`. It certifies that each commitment `C_i` is a
/// commitment to a positive number of bit-length `n_i`. Batch verifying range proofs is more
/// efficient than verifying independent range proofs on commitments `C_1, ..., C_N`
/// separately.
///
/// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
/// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that two commitments
/// `C_1` and `C_2` each hold positive 32-bit numbers.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `BatchedRangeProofU64Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyBatchedRangeProofU64,
/// Verify 128-bit batched range proof.
///
/// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
/// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that two commitments
/// `C_1` and `C_2` each hold positive 64-bit numbers.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `BatchedRangeProofU128Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyBatchedRangeProofU128,
/// Verify 256-bit batched range proof.
///
/// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
/// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that four commitments
/// `[C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]` each hold positive 64-bit numbers.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `BatchedRangeProofU256Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyBatchedRangeProofU256,
/// Verify a grouped-ciphertext with 2 handles validity proof.
///
/// A grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies that a grouped ElGamal ciphertext is
/// well-defined, i.e. the ciphertext can be decrypted by private keys associated with its
/// decryption handles.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `GroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidity,
/// Verify a batched grouped-ciphertext with 2 handles validity proof.
///
/// A batched grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies the validity of two grouped ElGamal
/// ciphertext that are encrypted using the same set of ElGamal public keys. A batched
/// grouped-ciphertext validity proof is shorter and more efficient than two individual
/// grouped-ciphertext validity proofs.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `BatchedGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyBatchedGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidity,
/// Verify a grouped-ciphertext with 3 handles validity proof.
///
/// A grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies that a grouped ElGamal ciphertext is
/// well-defined, i.e. the ciphertext can be decrypted by private keys associated with its
/// decryption handles.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// * Creating a proof context account
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` The proof context account owner
///
/// * Otherwise
/// None
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `GroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidity,
/// Verify a batched grouped-ciphertext with 3 handles validity proof.
///
/// A batched grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies the validity of two grouped ElGamal
/// ciphertext that are encrypted using the same set of ElGamal public keys. A batched
/// grouped-ciphertext validity proof is shorter and more efficient than two individual
/// grouped-ciphertext validity proofs.
///
/// Accounts expected by this instruction:
///
/// * Creating a proof context account
/// 0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
/// 1. `[writable]` The proof context account
/// 2. `[]` The proof context account owner
///
/// * Otherwise
/// None
///
/// The instruction expects either:
/// i. `BatchedGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
/// ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
///
VerifyBatchedGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidity,
}
/// Pubkeys associated with a context state account to be used as parameters to functions.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq)]
pub struct ContextStateInfo<'a> {
pub context_state_account: &'a Pubkey,
pub context_state_authority: &'a Pubkey,
}
/// Create a `CloseContextState` instruction.
pub fn close_context_state(
context_state_info: ContextStateInfo,
destination_account: &Pubkey,
) -> Instruction {
let accounts = vec![
AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
AccountMeta::new(*destination_account, false),
AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, true),
];
let data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(&ProofInstruction::CloseContextState).unwrap()];
Instruction {
program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
accounts,
data,
}
}
impl ProofInstruction {
pub fn encode_verify_proof<T, U>(
&self,
context_state_info: Option<ContextStateInfo>,
proof_data: &T,
) -> Instruction
where
T: Pod + ZkProofData<U>,
U: Pod,
{
let accounts = if let Some(context_state_info) = context_state_info {
vec![
AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, false),
]
} else {
vec![]
};
let mut data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(self).unwrap()];
data.extend_from_slice(bytes_of(proof_data));
Instruction {
program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
accounts,
data,
}
}
pub fn encode_verify_proof_from_account(
&self,
context_state_info: Option<ContextStateInfo>,
proof_account: &Pubkey,
offset: u32,
) -> Instruction {
let accounts = if let Some(context_state_info) = context_state_info {
vec![
AccountMeta::new(*proof_account, false),
AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, false),
]
} else {
vec![AccountMeta::new(*proof_account, false)]
};
let mut data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(self).unwrap()];
data.extend_from_slice(&offset.to_le_bytes());
Instruction {
program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
accounts,
data,
}
}
pub fn instruction_type(input: &[u8]) -> Option<Self> {
input
.first()
.and_then(|instruction| FromPrimitive::from_u8(*instruction))
}
pub fn proof_data<T, U>(input: &[u8]) -> Option<&T>
where
T: Pod + ZkProofData<U>,
U: Pod,
{
input
.get(1..)
.and_then(|data| bytemuck::try_from_bytes(data).ok())
}
}