solana_zk_sdk/zk_elgamal_proof_program/
instruction.rs

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
//! Instructions provided by the [`ZK ElGamal proof`] program.
//!
//! There are two types of instructions in the proof program: proof verification instructions and
//! the `CloseContextState` instruction.
//!
//! Each proof verification instruction verifies a certain type of zero-knowledge proof. These
//! instructions are processed by the program in two steps:
//!   1. The program verifies the zero-knowledge proof.
//!   2. The program optionally stores the context component of the zero-knowledge proof to a
//!      dedicated [`context-state`] account.
//!
//! In step 1, the zero-knowledge proof can either be included directly as the instruction data or
//! pre-written to an account. The progrma determines whether the proof is provided as instruction
//! data or pre-written to an account by inspecting the length of the data. If the instruction data
//! is exactly 5 bytes (instruction discriminator + unsigned 32-bit integer), then the program
//! assumes that the first account provided with the instruction contains the zero-knowledge proof
//! and verifies the account data at the offset specified in the instruction data. Otherwise, the
//! program assumes that the zero-knowledge proof is provided as part of the instruction data.
//!
//! In step 2, the program determines whether to create a context-state account by inspecting the
//! number of accounts provided with the instruction. If two additional accounts are provided with
//! the instruction after verifying the zero-knowledge proof, then the program writes the context
//! data to the specified context-state account.
//!
//! NOTE: A context-state account must be pre-allocated to the exact size of the context data that
//! is expected for a proof type before it is included as part of a proof verification instruction.
//!
//! The `CloseContextState` instruction closes a context state account. A transaction containing
//! this instruction must be signed by the context account's owner. This instruction can be used by
//! the account owner to reclaim lamports for storage.
//!
//! [`ZK ElGamal proof`]: https://docs.solanalabs.com/runtime/zk-token-proof
//! [`context-state`]: https://docs.solanalabs.com/runtime/zk-token-proof#context-data

use {
    crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::proof_data::ZkProofData,
    bytemuck::{bytes_of, Pod},
    num_derive::{FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive},
    num_traits::{FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive},
    solana_program::{
        instruction::{AccountMeta, Instruction},
        pubkey::Pubkey,
    },
};

#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, FromPrimitive, ToPrimitive, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[repr(u8)]
pub enum ProofInstruction {
    /// Close a zero-knowledge proof context state.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///   0. `[writable]` The proof context account to close
    ///   1. `[writable]` The destination account for lamports
    ///   2. `[signer]` The context account's owner
    ///
    /// Data expected by this instruction:
    ///   None
    ///
    CloseContextState,

    /// Verify a zero-ciphertext proof.
    ///
    /// A zero-ciphertext proof certifies that an ElGamal ciphertext encrypts the value zero.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `ZeroCiphertextProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyZeroCiphertext,

    /// Verify a ciphertext-ciphertext equality proof.
    ///
    /// A ciphertext-ciphertext equality proof certifies that two ElGamal ciphertexts encrypt the
    /// same message.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `CiphertextCiphertextEqualityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyCiphertextCiphertextEquality,

    /// Verify a ciphertext-commitment equality proof.
    ///
    /// A ciphertext-commitment equality proof certifies that an ElGamal ciphertext and a Pedersen
    /// commitment encrypt/encode the same message.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `CiphertextCommitmentEqualityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyCiphertextCommitmentEquality,

    /// Verify a public key validity zero-knowledge proof.
    ///
    /// A public key validity proof certifies that an ElGamal public key is well-formed and the
    /// prover knows the corresponding secret key.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `PubkeyValidityData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyPubkeyValidity,

    /// Verify a percentage-with-cap proof.
    ///
    /// A percentage-with-cap proof certifies that a tuple of Pedersen commitments satisfy a
    /// percentage relation.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `PercentageWithCapProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyPercentageWithCap,

    /// Verify a 64-bit batched range proof.
    ///
    /// A batched range proof is defined with respect to a sequence of Pedersen commitments `[C_1,
    /// ..., C_N]` and bit-lengths `[n_1, ..., n_N]`. It certifies that each commitment `C_i` is a
    /// commitment to a positive number of bit-length `n_i`. Batch verifying range proofs is more
    /// efficient than verifying independent range proofs on commitments `C_1, ..., C_N`
    /// separately.
    ///
    /// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
    /// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that two commitments
    /// `C_1` and `C_2` each hold positive 32-bit numbers.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `BatchedRangeProofU64Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyBatchedRangeProofU64,

    /// Verify 128-bit batched range proof.
    ///
    /// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
    /// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that two commitments
    /// `C_1` and `C_2` each hold positive 64-bit numbers.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `BatchedRangeProofU128Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyBatchedRangeProofU128,

    /// Verify 256-bit batched range proof.
    ///
    /// The bit-length of a batched range proof specifies the sum of the individual bit-lengths
    /// `n_1, ..., n_N`. For example, this instruction can be used to certify that four commitments
    /// `[C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4]` each hold positive 64-bit numbers.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `BatchedRangeProofU256Data` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyBatchedRangeProofU256,

    /// Verify a grouped-ciphertext with 2 handles validity proof.
    ///
    /// A grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies that a grouped ElGamal ciphertext is
    /// well-defined, i.e. the ciphertext can be decrypted by private keys associated with its
    /// decryption handles.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `GroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidity,

    /// Verify a batched grouped-ciphertext with 2 handles validity proof.
    ///
    /// A batched grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies the validity of two grouped ElGamal
    /// ciphertext that are encrypted using the same set of ElGamal public keys. A batched
    /// grouped-ciphertext validity proof is shorter and more efficient than two individual
    /// grouped-ciphertext validity proofs.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` (Optional) The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` (Optional) The proof context account owner
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `BatchedGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyBatchedGroupedCiphertext2HandlesValidity,

    /// Verify a grouped-ciphertext with 3 handles validity proof.
    ///
    /// A grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies that a grouped ElGamal ciphertext is
    /// well-defined, i.e. the ciphertext can be decrypted by private keys associated with its
    /// decryption handles.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   * Creating a proof context account
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` The proof context account owner
    ///
    ///   * Otherwise
    ///     None
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `GroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidity,

    /// Verify a batched grouped-ciphertext with 3 handles validity proof.
    ///
    /// A batched grouped-ciphertext validity proof certifies the validity of two grouped ElGamal
    /// ciphertext that are encrypted using the same set of ElGamal public keys. A batched
    /// grouped-ciphertext validity proof is shorter and more efficient than two individual
    /// grouped-ciphertext validity proofs.
    ///
    /// Accounts expected by this instruction:
    ///
    ///   * Creating a proof context account
    ///   0. `[]` (Optional) Account to read the proof from
    ///   1. `[writable]` The proof context account
    ///   2. `[]` The proof context account owner
    ///
    ///   * Otherwise
    ///     None
    ///
    /// The instruction expects either:
    ///   i. `BatchedGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidityProofData` if proof is provided as instruction data
    ///   ii. `u32` byte offset if proof is provided as an account
    ///
    VerifyBatchedGroupedCiphertext3HandlesValidity,
}

/// Pubkeys associated with a context state account to be used as parameters to functions.
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, PartialEq)]
pub struct ContextStateInfo<'a> {
    pub context_state_account: &'a Pubkey,
    pub context_state_authority: &'a Pubkey,
}

/// Create a `CloseContextState` instruction.
pub fn close_context_state(
    context_state_info: ContextStateInfo,
    destination_account: &Pubkey,
) -> Instruction {
    let accounts = vec![
        AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
        AccountMeta::new(*destination_account, false),
        AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, true),
    ];

    let data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(&ProofInstruction::CloseContextState).unwrap()];

    Instruction {
        program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
        accounts,
        data,
    }
}

impl ProofInstruction {
    pub fn encode_verify_proof<T, U>(
        &self,
        context_state_info: Option<ContextStateInfo>,
        proof_data: &T,
    ) -> Instruction
    where
        T: Pod + ZkProofData<U>,
        U: Pod,
    {
        let accounts = if let Some(context_state_info) = context_state_info {
            vec![
                AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
                AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, false),
            ]
        } else {
            vec![]
        };

        let mut data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(self).unwrap()];
        data.extend_from_slice(bytes_of(proof_data));

        Instruction {
            program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
            accounts,
            data,
        }
    }

    pub fn encode_verify_proof_from_account(
        &self,
        context_state_info: Option<ContextStateInfo>,
        proof_account: &Pubkey,
        offset: u32,
    ) -> Instruction {
        let accounts = if let Some(context_state_info) = context_state_info {
            vec![
                AccountMeta::new(*proof_account, false),
                AccountMeta::new(*context_state_info.context_state_account, false),
                AccountMeta::new_readonly(*context_state_info.context_state_authority, false),
            ]
        } else {
            vec![AccountMeta::new(*proof_account, false)]
        };

        let mut data = vec![ToPrimitive::to_u8(self).unwrap()];
        data.extend_from_slice(&offset.to_le_bytes());

        Instruction {
            program_id: crate::zk_elgamal_proof_program::id(),
            accounts,
            data,
        }
    }

    pub fn instruction_type(input: &[u8]) -> Option<Self> {
        input
            .first()
            .and_then(|instruction| FromPrimitive::from_u8(*instruction))
    }

    pub fn proof_data<T, U>(input: &[u8]) -> Option<&T>
    where
        T: Pod + ZkProofData<U>,
        U: Pod,
    {
        input
            .get(1..)
            .and_then(|data| bytemuck::try_from_bytes(data).ok())
    }
}