pub macro offset_of($Container:ty, $($fields:expr)+ $(,)?) {
...
}
Expand description
Expands to the offset in bytes of a field from the beginning of the given type.
The type may be a struct
, enum
, union
, or tuple.
The field may be a nested field (field1.field2
), but not an array index.
The field must be visible to the call site.
The offset is returned as a usize
.
§Offsets of, and in, dynamically sized types
The field’s type must be Sized
, but it may be located in a dynamically sized container.
If the field type is dynamically sized, then you cannot use offset_of!
(since the field’s
alignment, and therefore its offset, may also be dynamic) and must take the offset from an
actual pointer to the container instead.
#[repr(C)]
pub struct Struct<T: ?Sized> {
a: u8,
b: T,
}
#[derive(Debug)]
#[repr(C, align(4))]
struct Align4(u32);
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(Struct<dyn Debug>, a), 0); // OK — Sized field
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(Struct<Align4>, b), 4); // OK — not DST
// assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(Struct<dyn Debug>, b), 1);
// ^^^ error[E0277]: ... cannot be known at compilation time
// To obtain the offset of a !Sized field, examine a concrete value
// instead of using offset_of!.
let value: Struct<Align4> = Struct { a: 1, b: Align4(2) };
let ref_unsized: &Struct<dyn Debug> = &value;
let offset_of_b = unsafe {
(&raw const ref_unsized.b).byte_offset_from_unsigned(ref_unsized)
};
assert_eq!(offset_of_b, 4);
If you need to obtain the offset of a field of a !Sized
type, then, since the offset may
depend on the particular value being stored (in particular, dyn Trait
values have a
dynamically-determined alignment), you must retrieve the offset from a specific reference
or pointer, and so you cannot use offset_of!
to work without one.
§Layout is subject to change
Note that type layout is, in general, subject to change and
platform-specific. If
layout stability is required, consider using an explicit repr
attribute.
Rust guarantees that the offset of a given field within a given type will not change over the lifetime of the program. However, two different compilations of the same program may result in different layouts. Also, even within a single program execution, no guarantees are made about types which are similar but not identical, e.g.:
struct Wrapper<T, U>(T, U);
type A = Wrapper<u8, u8>;
type B = Wrapper<u8, i8>;
// Not necessarily identical even though `u8` and `i8` have the same layout!
// assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(A, 1), mem::offset_of!(B, 1));
#[repr(transparent)]
struct U8(u8);
type C = Wrapper<u8, U8>;
// Not necessarily identical even though `u8` and `U8` have the same layout!
// assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(A, 1), mem::offset_of!(C, 1));
struct Empty<T>(core::marker::PhantomData<T>);
// Not necessarily identical even though `PhantomData` always has the same layout!
// assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(Empty<u8>, 0), mem::offset_of!(Empty<i8>, 0));
§Unstable features
The following unstable features expand the functionality of offset_of!
:
offset_of_enum
— allowsenum
variants to be traversed as if they were fields.offset_of_slice
— allows getting the offset of a field of type[T]
.
§Examples
use std::mem;
#[repr(C)]
struct FieldStruct {
first: u8,
second: u16,
third: u8
}
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(FieldStruct, first), 0);
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(FieldStruct, second), 2);
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(FieldStruct, third), 4);
#[repr(C)]
struct NestedA {
b: NestedB
}
#[repr(C)]
struct NestedB(u8);
assert_eq!(mem::offset_of!(NestedA, b.0), 0);