orx-fixed-vec
An efficient constant access time vector with fixed capacity and pinned elements.
A. Motivation
There are various situations where pinned elements are critical.
- It is critical in enabling efficient, convenient and safe self-referential collections with thin references, see
SelfRefCol
for details, and its special cases such asLinkedList
. - It is important for concurrent programs as it eliminates safety concerns related with elements implicitly carried to different memory locations. This helps reducing and dealing with the complexity of concurrency, and leads to efficient concurrent data structures. See
ConcurrentIter
,ConcurrentBag
orConcurrentOrderedBag
for such concurrent data structures which are conveniently built on the pinned element guarantees of pinned vectors. - It is essential in allowing an immutable push vector; i.e.,
ImpVec
. This is a very useful operation when the desired collection is a bag or a container of things, rather than having a collective meaning. In such cases,ImpVec
allows avoiding certain borrow checker complexities, heap allocations and wide pointers such asBox
orRc
or etc.
B. Comparison with SplitVec
SplitVec
is another PinnedVec
implementation aiming the same goal but with different features. You may see the comparison in the table below.
FixedVec |
SplitVec |
---|---|
Implements PinnedVec => can be wrapped by an ImpVec or SelfRefCol or ConcurrentBag , etc. |
Implements PinnedVec => can as well be wrapped by them. |
Requires exact capacity to be known while creating. | Can be created with any level of prior information about required capacity. |
Cannot grow beyond capacity; panics when push is called at capacity. |
Can grow dynamically. Further, it provides control on how it must grow. |
It is just a wrapper around std::vec::Vec ; hence, has equivalent performance. |
Performance-optimized built-in growth strategies also have std::vec::Vec equivalent performance. |
After the performance optimizations on the SplitVec
, it is now comparable to std::vec::Vec
in terms of performance. This might make SplitVec
a dominating choice over FixedVec
.
C. Examples
C.1. Usage similar to std::vec::Vec
Most common std::vec::Vec
operations are available in FixedVec
with the same signature.
use *;
// capacity is not optional
let mut vec = new;
assert_eq!;
vec.push;
assert!;
assert_eq!;
vec.extend_from_slice;
assert_eq!;
assert!;
// vec.push(42); // push would've panicked when vec.is_full()
vec = 10;
assert_eq!;
vec.remove;
vec.insert;
assert_eq!;
assert_eq!;
let std_vec: = vec.into;
assert_eq!;
C.2. Pinned Elements
Unless elements are removed from the vector, the memory location of an element already pushed to the SplitVec
never changes unless explicitly changed.
use *;
let mut vec = new;
// push the first element
vec.push;
assert_eq!;
// let's get a pointer to the first element
let addr42 = &vec as *const usize;
// let's push 99 new elements
for i in 1..100
for i in 0..100
// the memory location of the first element remains intact
assert_eq!;
// we can safely dereference it and read the correct value
// dereferencing is still unsafe for FixedVec,
// but the underlying guarantee will be used by wrappers such as ImpVec or SelfRefCol
assert_eq!;
// the next push when `vec.is_full()` panics!
// vec.push(0);
D. Benchmarks
Since FixedVec
is just a wrapper around the std::vec::Vec
with additional pinned element guarantee; it is expected to have equivalent performance. This is tested and confirmed by benchmarks that can be found at the at benches folder.
License
This library is licensed under MIT license. See LICENSE for details.