regex-automata 0.2.0

Automata construction and matching using regular expressions.
Documentation
pattern_limit should not be defined inside nfa::thompson, but rather at the
top-level.

-----

Main problem right now is exemplified by the set60 and set70 failing tests. In
particular, when finding the starting position while matching multiple regexes
simultaneously, the reverse search is messed up. The reverse search doesn't
depend on which regex matched in the forward direction, which means it won't
always find the correcting starting location. Unfortunately, the only way to
fix this, as far as I can tell, is to add a group of start states for every
regex in the DFA. Then once we do the reverse search, we need to choose the
correct start state based on which regex matched in the forward direction.

This is a nasty change.

So it looks like this only applies when doing an overlapping search in reverse
to find the start of a match. That means we should make this configurable
but enable it by default for the reverse automata. It should be configurable
so that folks can construct a regex that doesn't have the ability to do
overlapping searches correctly. If an overlapping search is attempted with
a reverse automaton that lacks starting states for each pattern, then the
implementation should panic.

BUT! It is also convenient to provide this option in general for folks that
want a DFA that can match any pattern while also being able to match a specific
pattern.

Straw man:

* Update dense::Config to have a `starts_for_each_pattern` option. It should
  be disabled by default.
* In `RegexBuilder::build_many_with_size` tweak the reverse DFA configuration
  to have the aforementioned option enabled.
* It would be interesting to add new APIs to `Regex` that support matching
  specific patterns, but I think this is a complication. If we did want to do
  this, then we should just add it to the `_at` variants and leave the rest of
  the API untouched.
* Add a `pattern_id: Option<PatternID>` parameter to each of the five
  `*_at` methods on the `dfa::Automaton` trait. A value of `None` retains the
  existing behavior. A `Some` value means that the starting state for that
  specific pattern must be chosen, which in turn implies an anchored search.
  (This means `starts_for_each_pattern` has utility for single-pattern DFAs
  since it makes it possible to build a DFA that can do both unanchored and
  anchored searches.)
* Thread this new parameter down into the various functions in `dfa::search`
  all the way down into `init_fwd` and `init_rev`. These functions will then
  pass it to `dfa.start_state_{forward,reverse}`.
* This is where things get gruesome since we now need to completely re-work how
  start states are represented in dense and sparse DFAs _and_ it needs to be
  configurable. It looks like the `Start` type from `dfa::automaton` can
  basically remain unchanged, since it still represents one of the four
  possible starting states that will need to be applied for every pattern.
* For `dfa::dense`, change `StartList` to `StartTable`. Currently, its only
  header is the state ID count, which is always 4. We'll want to change this
  to the stride and add a new header value that encodes the number of patterns.
  When the number of patterns is zero, then existing behavior is preserved and
  represents the case where `starts_for_each_pattern` is disabled (or in the
  case of an empty DFA). When non-zero, a table of starting state IDs is
  encoded with each row corresponding to the 4 starting states for each
  pattern. Before this table (even if it's empty), the 4 starting states for
  the entire DFA are encoded.
* For `dfa::sparse`, do the same as above. They are essentially the same right
  now anyway, with the only difference being that sparse DFAs use `&[u8]`
  instead of `&[S]` (because sparse DFAs don't have any alignment
  requirements).
* Modify `DFA::empty` to accept a `starts_for_each_pattern` bool that, when
  true, creates a start table with the header, the start states for the entire
  DFA and a row of start states for each pattern. When false, no rows are
  added.
* Expose whether there are starting states for each pattern via a predicate
  on the DFA.
* Modify the determinizer's `add_starts` method to basically do what it does,
  but also do it for each pattern when the DFA is configured for it. It should
  continue to reuse states as appropriate or not generate new states if they
  aren't needed. This will want to use the `NFA::start_pattern` method, which
  provides the starting NFA state ID for the given pattern.
* Fix the dense->sparse conversion. At this point, this piece should be fairly
  straight-forward since the sparse representation of starting states is
  basically identical to the dense representation.

At this point, I think the bug should resolve itself.

^^^^ DONE! IT WORKS!

-----


Add top-level SyntaxConfig (or some such) that has all of the regex-syntax
options forwarded, but with automata oriented docs. Then use this for all of
the engines instead of having to repeat every option for every builder.

-----

These produce different results. PCRE2 looks correct. Basically, we should be
using the context around the `at` position correctly, which we aren't doing
right now. Seems tricky to get right, particularly when confirming the match
with a reverse DFA.

Maybe our 'at' functions need to take a full range... Sigh. This is indeed what
RE2 does. GAH.

fn main() {
    let re = regex::Regex::new(r"(?-u)\b\sbar").unwrap();
    let s = "foo bar baz";
    println!("{:?}", re.find_at(s, 3).map(|m| m.as_str()));

    let re = pcre2::bytes::Regex::new(r"\b\sbar").unwrap();
    let s = "foo bar baz";
    println!("{:?}", re.find_at(s.as_bytes(), 3).unwrap());
}

^^^^ This is fixed now, but we still need to find a way to add test coverage
for "context" searches. It'd be nice to do this automatically, but we'll
probably just added a new 'context = [start, end]' option.

-----


* Create regex-test crate, based on glob-test. Try to anticipate the needs for
  the full regex test suite.
  * See if we can clean up tests.
    * Provide a way to mark a test as expensive.
    * Provide a way to test is_match_at and find_at.
    * Test shortest_match_at too? Huge pain. Add tests for it.
    * Port ALL tests from the regex crate. Will probably need a way to mark a
      test as skipped.
    * Document tests better.
* Find a way to remove byteorder dependency.
* Reorganize crate API:
  * Have errors contain `Box<Error+Send+Sync>` instead of `String`.
  * Make errors non-exhaustive.
  * Audit `StateID` trait for safety.
  * Brainstorm hard about `DFA` trait and the fact that DenseDFA and SparseDFA
    have inefficient implementations of some methods. Maybe use multiple
    traits? Answer: get rid of premultiply/classes knobs and just enable
    them by default. Should remove a huge amount of code.
  * Check whether `unsafe` is really needed to eliminate bounds checks. Use
    micro-benchmarks and bigger CLI workloads using `regex-automata-debug`.
  * Re-write module docs for `dfa` as they are no longer top-level. Keep most.
  * Retain any pertinent top-level crate docs, but don't rewrite yet.
  * Clean up builders if we can. e.g., Determinizer, minimizer, it's all a mess
    right now.
  * Clean up and add 'always_match' and 'never_match' constructors for every
    regex engine.
  * See about supporting ^, $, \A, \z, \b and \B in DFAs. Do the non-Unicode
    version of \b unfortunately. Carefully scrutinize how the regex crate's
    lazy DFA does it and try to make it comprehensible. Done! Except for the
    part about making it comprehensible.
* Rethink prefilters?
* Add `regex-automata-generate` CLI tool. This should just be a copy of
  the `ucd-generate dfa` and `ucd-generate regex` commands.

Then build new public `nfa` sub-module.
  * For Unicode \b, generate \w DFA (forwards and reverse) and embed it into
    source for fast checking. That way, we don't need to ever do explicit UTF-8
    decoding anywhere. Yay.

Then `lazy` sub-module.

Then `onepass`.

Then `jit`.

... and beyond? CRAZY. But it can be done! Build STRONG base layers.