Expand description
A scoped, structured logging and diagnostics system.
§Overview
tokio-trace
is a framework for instrumenting Rust programs to collect
structured, event-based diagnostic information.
In asynchronous systems like Tokio, interpreting traditional log messages can
often be quite challenging. Since individual tasks are multiplexed on the same
thread, associated events and log lines are intermixed making it difficult to
trace the logic flow. tokio-trace
expands upon logging-style diagnostics by
allowing libraries and applications to record structured events with additional
information about temporality and causality — unlike a log message, a span
in tokio-trace
has a beginning and end time, may be entered and exited by the
flow of execution, and may exist within a nested tree of similar spans. In
addition, tokio-trace
spans are structured, with the ability to record typed
data as well as textual messages.
The tokio-trace
crate provides the APIs necessary for instrumenting libraries
and applications to emit trace data.
§Core Concepts
The core of tokio-trace
’s API is composed of Event
s, Span
s, and
Subscriber
s. We’ll cover these in turn.
§Span
s
A Span
represents a period of time during which a program was executing
in some context. A thread of execution is said to enter a span when it
begins executing in that context, and to exit the span when switching to
another context. The span in which a thread is currently executing is
referred to as the current span.
For example:
#[macro_use]
extern crate tokio_trace;
use tokio_trace::Level;
span!(Level::TRACE, "my_span").enter(|| {
// perform some work in the context of `my_span`...
});
Spans form a tree structure — unless it is a root span, all spans have a parent, and may have one or more children. When a new span is created, the current span becomes the new span’s parent. The total execution time of a span consists of the time spent in that span and in the entire subtree represented by its children. Thus, a parent span always lasts for at least as long as the longest-executing span in its subtree.
// this span is considered the "root" of a new trace tree:
span!(Level::INFO, "root").enter(|| {
// since we are now inside "root", this span is considered a child
// of "root":
span!(Level::DEBUG, "outer_child").enter(|| {
// this span is a child of "outer_child", which is in turn a
// child of "root":
span!(Level::TRACE, "inner_child").enter(|| {
// and so on...
});
});
});
In addition, data may be associated with spans. A span may have fields — a set of key-value pairs describing the state of the program during that span; an optional name, and metadata describing the source code location where the span was originally entered.
// construct a new span with three fields:
// - "foo", with a value of 42,
// - "bar", with the value "false"
// - "baz", with no initial value
let my_span = span!(Level::INFO, "my_span", foo = 42, bar = false, baz);
// record a value for the field "baz" declared above:
my_span.record("baz", &"hello world");
§When to use spans
As a rule of thumb, spans should be used to represent discrete units of work (e.g., a given request’s lifetime in a server) or periods of time spent in a given context (e.g., time spent interacting with an instance of an external system, such as a database).
Which scopes in a program correspond to new spans depend somewhat on user intent. For example, consider the case of a loop in a program. Should we construct one span and perform the entire loop inside of that span, like:
span!(Level::TRACE, "my loop").enter(|| {
for i in 0..n {
// ...
}
})
Or, should we create a new span for each iteration of the loop, as in:
for i in 0..n {
span!(Level::TRACE, "my loop", iteration = i).enter(|| {
// ...
})
}
Depending on the circumstances, we might want to do either, or both. For example, if we want to know how long was spent in the loop overall, we would create a single span around the entire loop; whereas if we wanted to know how much time was spent in each individual iteration, we would enter a new span on every iteration.
§Events
An Event
represents a point in time. It signifies something that
happened while the trace was executing. Event
s are comparable to the log
records emitted by unstructured logging code, but unlike a typical log line,
an Event
may occur within the context of a Span
. Like a Span
, it
may have fields, and implicitly inherits any of the fields present on its
parent span.
For example:
// records an event outside of any span context:
event!(Level::INFO, "something happened");
span!(Level::INFO, "my_span").enter(|| {
// records an event within "my_span".
event!(Level::DEBUG, "something happened inside my_span");
});
Essentially, Event
s exist to bridge the gap between traditional
unstructured logging and span-based tracing. Similar to log records, they
may be recorded at a number of levels, and can have unstructured,
human-readable messages; however, they also carry key-value data and exist
within the context of the tree of spans that comprise a trace. Thus,
individual log record-like events can be pinpointed not only in time, but
in the logical execution flow of the system.
Events are represented as a special case of spans — they are created, they may have fields added, and then they close immediately, without being entered.
In general, events should be used to represent points in time within a span — a request returned with a given status code, n new items were taken from a queue, and so on.
§Subscriber
s
As Span
s and Event
s occur, they are recorded or aggregated by
implementations of the Subscriber
trait. Subscriber
s are notified
when an Event
takes place and when a Span
is entered or exited. These
notifications are represented by the following Subscriber
trait methods:
observe_event
, called when anEvent
takes place,enter
, called when execution enters aSpan
,exit
, called when execution exits aSpan
In addition, subscribers may implement the enabled
function to filter
the notifications they receive based on metadata describing each Span
or Event
. If a call to Subscriber::enabled
returns false
for a given
set of metadata, that Subscriber
will not be notified about the
corresponding Span
or Event
. For performance reasons, if no currently
active subscribers express interest in a given set of metadata by returning
true
, then the corresponding Span
or Event
will never be constructed.
§Usage
First, add this to your Cargo.toml
:
[dependencies]
tokio-trace = "0.1"
Next, add this to your crate:
#[macro_use]
extern crate tokio_trace;
Span
s are constructed using the span!
macro, and then entered
to indicate that some code takes place within the context of that Span
:
// Construct a new span named "my span" with trace log level.
let span = span!(Level::TRACE, "my span");
span.enter(|| {
// Any trace events in this closure or code called by it will occur within
// the span.
});
// Dropping the span will close it, indicating that it has ended.
Event
s are created using the event!
macro, and are recorded when the
event is dropped:
use tokio_trace::Level;
event!(Level::INFO, "something has happened!");
Users of the log
crate should note that tokio-trace
exposes a set of
macros for creating Event
s (trace!
, debug!
, info!
, warn!
, and
error!
) which may be invoked with the same syntax as the similarly-named
macros from the log
crate. Often, the process of converting a project to
use tokio-trace
can begin with a simple drop-in replacement.
Let’s consider the log
crate’s yak-shaving example:
#[macro_use]
extern crate tokio_trace;
use tokio_trace::{field, Level};
pub fn shave_the_yak(yak: &mut Yak) {
// Create a new span for this invocation of `shave_the_yak`, annotated
// with the yak being shaved as a *field* on the span.
span!(Level::TRACE, "shave_the_yak", yak = field::debug(&yak)).enter(|| {
// Since the span is annotated with the yak, it is part of the context
// for everything happening inside the span. Therefore, we don't need
// to add it to the message for this event, as the `log` crate does.
info!(target: "yak_events", "Commencing yak shaving");
loop {
match find_a_razor() {
Ok(razor) => {
// We can add the razor as a field rather than formatting it
// as part of the message, allowing subscribers to consume it
// in a more structured manner:
info!({ razor = field::display(razor) }, "Razor located");
yak.shave(razor);
break;
}
Err(err) => {
// However, we can also create events with formatted messages,
// just as we would for log records.
warn!("Unable to locate a razor: {}, retrying", err);
}
}
}
})
}
You can find examples showing how to use this crate in the examples directory.
§In libraries
Libraries should link only to the tokio-trace
crate, and use the provided
macros to record whatever information will be useful to downstream
consumers.
§In executables
In order to record trace events, executables have to use a Subscriber
implementation compatible with tokio-trace
. A Subscriber
implements a
way of collecting trace data, such as by logging it to standard output.
Unlike the log
crate, tokio-trace
does not use a global Subscriber
which is initialized once. Instead, it follows the tokio
pattern of
executing code in a context. For example:
#[macro_use]
extern crate tokio_trace;
let my_subscriber = FooSubscriber::new();
tokio_trace::subscriber::with_default(my_subscriber, || {
// Any trace events generated in this closure or by functions it calls
// will be collected by `my_subscriber`.
})
This approach allows trace data to be collected by multiple subscribers
within different contexts in the program. Alternatively, a single subscriber
may be constructed by the main
function and all subsequent code executed
with that subscriber as the default. Any trace events generated outside the
context of a subscriber will not be collected.
The executable itself may use the tokio-trace
crate to instrument itself
as well.
The tokio-trace-nursery
repository contains less stable crates designed
to be used with the tokio-trace
ecosystem. It includes a collection of
Subscriber
implementations, as well as utility and adapter crates.
In particular, the following tokio-trace-nursery
crates are likely to be
of interest:
tokio-trace-futures
provides a compatibility layer with thefutures
crate, allowing spans to be attached toFuture
s,Stream
s, andExecutor
s.tokio-trace-fmt
provides aSubscriber
implementation for logging formatted trace data to stdout, with similar filtering and formatting to theenv-logger
crate.tokio-trace-log
provides a compatibility layer with thelog
crate, allowing logRecord
s to be recorded astokio-trace
Event
s within the trace tree. This is useful when a project usingtokio-trace
have dependencies which uselog
.
§Crate Feature Flags
The following crate feature flags are available:
- A set of features controlling the static verbosity level.
log
causes trace instrumentation points to emitlog
records as well as trace events. This is inteded for use in libraries whose users may be using eithertokio-trace
orlog
.
[dependencies]
tokio-trace = { version = "0.1", features = ["log"] }
Re-exports§
pub use self::span::Span;
Modules§
- Dispatches trace events to
Subscriber
s.c - Events represent single points in time during the execution of a program.
- Structured data associated with
Span
s andEvent
s. - Trace verbosity level filtering.
- Spans represent periods of time in the execution of a program.
- Collects and records trace data.
Macros§
- Constructs an event at the debug level.
- Constructs a span at the debug level.
- Constructs an event at the error level.
- Constructs a span at the error level.
- Constructs a new
Event
. - Constructs an event at the info level.
- Constructs a span at the info level.
- Constructs a new span.
- Constructs an event at the trace level.
- Constructs a span at the trace level.
- Constructs an event at the warn level.
- Constructs a span at the warn level.
Structs§
Dispatch
trace data to aSubscriber
.Event
s represent single points in time where something occurred during the execution of a program.- Describes the level of verbosity of a span or event.
- Metadata describing a span or [event].
Traits§
- Trait representing the functions required to collect trace data.
- A field value of an erased type.